Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Science News - by scipa

 
Science News on research in the fields of: Evolution - Robotics - Genes - Embryonic Stem Cells - Astronomy - Biology - Geology - Archeology - Engineering - Disease Treatments

Better than Teflon? Discovered by accident!

November 27th 2008 00:02
New material better than Teflon BAM
Teflon has definitely improved my life - before Teflon, I was scraping out burnt scrambled eggs off my skillets. Now, with the gentle ease of a hungry giant, I flip perfect sunny-side-up eggs onto my toast, and then dollop a little touch of Hollandaise sauce.


That's not good enough for these ungrateful scientists, though... they accidentally found a substance, which they call BAM, that is one of the world's hardest substances, and is much more slippery than Teflon.

Is that important? Damn straight - the fight against friction is what drives much of mechanical research... friction is the loss of kinetic energy to heat, which is, generally, something that we'd like to avoid.

[HTML3456]<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" Really Long Link name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed Really Long Link type="application/x-shockwave -flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/HTML[


BAM is nearly as hard as diamond, which means that it can be used in industrial applications - additionally, whereas Teflon has a friction coefficient of 0.05, BAM throws down the gauntlet at just 0.02.

They don't know why it's so slippery - but they call it 'self-lubricating', that maybe the substance pulls in water molecules from the air, which coats the surface in a thin layer of water.

Would this work in an arid environment? Is there always water in air? What about in a hot engine - would this layer of water persist?

From the article:

"Bruce Cook, lead investigator on the Ames Lab project, estimates that merely coating rotors with the material could save US industry alone 330 trillion kilojoules (9 billion kilowatt hours) every year by 2030 - about $179 million a year."

-and, hey, who knows how long before we get a BAM-coated skillet. Right?




78
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Comments
1 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by alt_ed

November 27th 2008 11:55
Well, it would be nice not to have to worry about scratching the BAM of your skillet.. Teflon is sooo annoying for that reason!

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
3 Posts
7 Posts
3 Posts
178 Posts dating from March 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

scipa's Blogs

644 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
12 Post(s)
419 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
10 Post(s)
193 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
3 Post(s)
217 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
4 Post(s)
3060 Vote(s)
2 Comment(s)
36 Post(s)
3422 Vote(s)
20 Comment(s)
47 Post(s)
Moderated by scipa
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]